X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1229FC738 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:12:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82068-07 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:12:31 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C159FD14E for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:12:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67]) by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C00F407B; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:12:28 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: Re: PostgreSQL web site Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:12:30 +0200 Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FB7E@algol.sollentuna.se> In-Reply-To: <15501.1156790439@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL web site Thread-Index: AcbK0XuR5OG3gdg9QkO1bfoNWDnU0gABEC8Q From: "Magnus Hagander" To: "Tom Lane" Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , "Naz Gassiep" , X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.182 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/122 X-Sequence-Number: 10513 > >> Actually that is a very good question... why are we not using=20 > >> mod_deflate? >=20 > > Good question. It's definitly worth investigating. >=20 > What are we talking about here --- some hack to make users'=20 > web browsers decompress pages on-the-fly?=20 Yes. > How much does that=20 > slow down the browsing experience, if you've got an old slow=20 > PC? (I can believe that if you've got a fast PC and a slow=20 > internet connection, it could make things faster overall ...=20 > but the breakeven point is not obvious.)=20 In most cases it's faster or unnoticably slower. At the speed your machine would have to be to notice the problem, I don't think you can load a modern-enough browser to actually look at the site. > What are the odds=20 > that people using older browsers will be locked out entirely? They should be zero, if you use mod_deflate. The browser sends an Accept-encoding: deflate (or similar, I'm not 100% on the name of the header, and too lazy to look it up). If this is not present in the request, an uncompressed version of the page is sent back to the browser. //Magnus