X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx2.hub.org [200.46.204.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0137711F6C93 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:10:19 -0300 (ADT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Score: -2.133 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.133 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.332, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, SPF_PASS=-0.001] Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx2.hub.org [200.46.204.254]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Krvzlhuo6YEC for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:10:16 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B418111F6B4A for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:10:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67]) by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF02E8F289; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:10:14 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: Re: Meeting at the conference Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:10:14 +0200 Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA352AF@algol.sollentuna.se> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Meeting at the conference Thread-Index: AcZi36poJw4zOdnkTMOBLxUNRcqOfQAAEWCwAAAsZ9A= From: "Magnus Hagander" To: "Dave Page" , "Devrim GUNDUZ" Cc: X-Archive-Number: 200604/74 X-Sequence-Number: 9850 > > - I'd like to have a *written* policy about the news and=20 > event items. > > When someone wants to step up the plate with us, we should=20 > be able to=20 > > point that guy about our policies. >=20 > Yup Per IM discussion, this of course means that Devrim just volounteered to write a proposal ;-) > > - I'd like to drink beer after the meeting. >=20 > Definitely. Ok. That decides it, now I'm definitly coming to this talk. > > - I'd like to see the captcha for the comment (and possibly=20 > also for=20 > > news and event) submissions >=20 > Well, that was implemented and demonstrated very recently by=20 > Travis, based on Geviks work. There were accessibilty=20 > problems which were discussed and iirc, it seems like more=20 > hassle to implement an accessible captcha system than to just=20 > delete the few spam comments we get each day. Might want to talk about what we can do about the spam submissions in general, perhaps, rather than focusing on just that. > > That's what I have in my mind now. >=20 > Thanks - I'll compile an agenda based on this and any other=20 > comments we get. Where did the bugtracker discussion go?! ;-) Do we want this to be specificallyi website, or "server systems in general". If it's servers in general, I propose adding something about settnig up a more common structure of how to maintain the machines - different machines are handled in different ways now in too many ways, imho. If just web, well. Perhaps something about enhancing the download system, and the future of the bittorrent stuff. //Magnus