X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BC59FB1F9; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:56:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39188-07; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:56:52 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677BD9FB1F8; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:56:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67]) by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B971FF40F3; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:56:50 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search results Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:56:50 +0200 Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA355DE@algol.sollentuna.se> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search results Thread-Index: AcbLIjKn6drejQ6eQ66p5JcKlBnoaAAHeVew References: From: "Magnus Hagander" To: "Greg Sabino Mullane" , Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.18 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/157 X-Sequence-Number: 10548 Wouldn't this be better on -www? :-P > I had an idea while discussing the limitations of our searching on > irc with a few folks. As far as Google putting old 7.x and 6.x > documentation results up, why not create a new subdomain such as > oldocs.postgres.org and stick anything older than a version of two > there. We could still link to it, and leave some redirects in place > for old links, but the new subdomain would ensure that they would > have relatively *low* Google results compared to the more recent > docs, which is what we want. Don't we have enough silly domains already? If we want to get rid of those hits, why don't we just add a robots.txt and tell google not to index the old docs at all? (If people *need* hits in the old docs, they can always hit our own search engine for those docs) //Magnus