X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CC09FB36D;
	Fri, 22 Sep 2006 04:24:59 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 35081-10; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:24:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from mx-2.sollentuna.net (mx-2.sollentuna.net [195.84.163.199])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFDC9FB366;
	Fri, 22 Sep 2006 04:24:44 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from ALGOL.sollentuna.se (janus.sollentuna.se [62.65.68.67])
	by mx-2.sollentuna.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 91BFEF40F0; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:24:42 +0200 (CEST)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Who admins DNS?
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:24:42 +0200
Message-ID: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA356ED@algol.sollentuna.se>
In-Reply-To: <20060921224531.S83732@ganymede.hub.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Who admins DNS?
Thread-Index: Acbd6Ymh2FPLryjoTcOUd90jGVpvzwALohJg
References: <20060913140007.GC14580@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
	<6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA3569A@algol.sollentuna.se>
	<20060921211719.GE22214@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
	<20060921224531.S83732@ganymede.hub.org>
From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>,
	"Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Cc: <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.134 tagged_above=0 required=5
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO, SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200609/190
X-Sequence-Number: 10768

> > In the meantime, I'm prepared to act as another slave server.
> The
> > location I'm thinking of putting it has 30Mb connectivity, 12
> hour
> > battery and on-site generators; but I could put it somewhere with
> more
> > bandwidth if people think that'd be necessary.
>=20
> Right now, we are up to two in the UK, 3 in the US, 1 in Toronto
> and 3 in Panama ... not sure where "yet another" would be ideally
> located ...

Well, one interesting thing is: are the two UK on the same connection?
The 3 US? The 3 panama? Or are they on different providers in said
country?

Otherwise, just looking at the list, east asia or Australia would be the
logical place...

//Magnus