Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738EF9FA24A; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:30:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24038-02-2; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:30:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904BF9FB63C; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:30:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E65685C901; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:30:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17830-03; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:30:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C79685C8F9; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:30:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDB24AAD0; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:30:47 -0300 (ADT) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:30:47 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Tom Lane , Magnus Hagander cc: Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists Message-ID: <6EFFA29CD4051EFDB87937F6@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <14128.1176301582@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <7550.1176268648@sss.pgh.pa.us> <461C918A.4040701@postgresql.org> <20070411082702.GA1810@svr2.hagander.net> <14128.1176301582@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200704/51 X-Sequence-Number: 11801 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I checked both of those last night when you reported it ... there was one spam in -bugs and a few from Kris Kennedy in -hackers, but that was it ... - --On Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:26:22 -0400 Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:43:06AM +0100, Dave Page wrote: >>> Which lists are slow? > >> In my case, -patches and -committers. Looking at the thread I *think* Tom >> was referring to, also -hackers. > > At the time I was particularly concerned about -hackers and -bugs, but > I'm not sure which lists have the issue overall. I regularly notice > batches of two-or-three-day-old messages being released together, > perhaps several times a week, and hadn't paid any particular attention > to which lists they were on. I file all the PG lists I read (which is > most of them) into one folder, so it all kinda blurs together ... but > I think -bugs is in need of more attention because it's particularly > likely to get submissions from non-subscribers. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGHP8n4QvfyHIvDvMRAjrLAKCK+cDhJ+HX31KQAdbLHjSYjtgK4QCfSDYm VNkW+JlXD2PcnVzocQh8A6A= =UB1c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----