Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C969FA0C7; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:50:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16671-07; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:50:10 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from noel.decibel.org (noel.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADAA9FB68B; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:50:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [10.82.1.66] (docboy.decibel.org [65.86.67.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by noel.decibel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92E8564A5; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:49:54 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <46670885.1050207@hagander.net> References: <20070606164029.GB11800@alvh.no-ip.org> <46670885.1050207@hagander.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <74EDDCA2-5C8F-46D1-BC15-3C531BD66D3E@decibel.org> Cc: Alvaro Herrera , nikolay@samokhvalov.com, pgsql-www@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-documentation Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Nasby Subject: Re: [DOCS] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version? Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:49:44 -0500 To: Magnus Hagander X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/13 X-Sequence-Number: 12160 On Jun 6, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote: >>> I've just found (via google...) useful (for me) comments: >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/sql- >>> createaggregate.html >>> -- I mean users comments under primary contents of the page. >>> >>> These comments were written for 8.0, but are useful for the current >>> versions too. What we have is the situation that reading docs for >>> 8.2 >>> people don't see these comments -- so this potentially useful >>> information is lost. So, in this implementation the idea of comments >>> for docs becomes weak in general. >> >> The thing to do in these cases is to move the useful info from the >> user >> comments into the main doc text. > > Yeah, that's the idea. Tom often goes through the comments and puts > stuff into the docs. But I'm sure there are a *lot* of other people > who > could help with that as well - read comments, figure out of they make > sense, and submit a docs patch for the next version! It would be substantially easier to do that if there was an index page that listed all comments. -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)