Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2681D9FB3B1 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:17:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56454-07 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:17:30 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04419FB20D for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:17:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3B5HSt1007551 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:17:28 -0400 (EDT) To: pgsql-www@postgreSQL.org Subject: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:17:28 -0400 Message-ID: <7550.1176268648@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200704/35 X-Sequence-Number: 11785 I thought we had things set up so that there were multiple people moderating the postgres mail lists, but it seems like the average time to approve postings from unsubscribed folk has slid back down to the two-or-three-day range :-(. What can be done to improve that? Maybe recruit a few more moderators? regards, tom lane