From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
In-reply-to: <51154497.3000709@gmx.net>
References: <5112C602.3090109@agliodbs.com> <511513E5.10104@gmx.net>
	<16562.1360339107@sss.pgh.pa.us> <51154497.3000709@gmx.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
	message dated "Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:31:51 -0500"
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:41:22 -0500
Message-ID: <7677.1360348882@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 2/8/13 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ...  I don't object to people using their
>> tools-of-choice to perform reviewing, but we need some way of making
>> sure that the reviews get archived.

> Gerrit sends me an email every times something happens, so I think this
> is not going to be a problem.

As long as it can be persuaded to mail the text of reviews (not just a
notification), that'd probably be all right.

> What it doesn't support AFAICT is sending emails *in*, but I don't see
> that as a requirement.

Meh.  Many of the complaints about the current CF application boil down
to the fact that it doesn't accept email input, so I'm not really
convinced that a different tool that also doesn't accept email input
is going to be a big step forward.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers