Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9459FB927 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69968-09 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DE19FB7F8 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C860B46EA0 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70957-03; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD02B46E9F; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [192.168.1.3]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375C68E0EA; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:44 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:39 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Peter Eisentraut , Josh Berkus cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Location of PostgreSQL Performance Test Lab Message-ID: <7F5A01768C3F75F5AA2B502E@fserv.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <200707312000.39340.peter_e@gmx.net> References: <200707310919.10745.josh@agliodbs.com> <200707311914.40304.peter_e@gmx.net> <200707311022.30818.josh@agliodbs.com> <200707312000.39340.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/90 X-Sequence-Number: 12237 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, July 31, 2007 20:00:38 +0200 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> Right, and that's made more complex if the main users aren't clear on >> where the machine is. > > You have certainly heard of the world wide web, where you can easily > publish fabulous lists of information in easily accessible form. Have to agree with Peter on this one ... not necessarily with as much sarcasm, of course ... that one is a weak argument ... > If you can find someone to host everything, great, but you have in fact > already rejected two machines because they are not at the right > location, when I can see great use for those machines no matter where > they are. Have to agree here as well ... sounds like you are looking for utopia where we generally live in a world of limbo ... >> I also think you're arguing for the sake of arguing; you don't do >> performance testing and AFAIK are not planning to host any of the >> machines. > > I think you are wrong. And on this one, I definitely agree, but for different reasons ... there is nobody on this list that a) can provide hosting for this or b) you would host with ... and those that will/would do the performance testing don't care in the least if the servers are in California or Timbuktoo ... so if you didn't want discussion on this, why bother posting it here ... ? - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGr4MX4QvfyHIvDvMRAl2HAJ9j6q6/1sOSunVlcnfp3v9RXkXpxACgs11/ jRZ3UmiROthE4/+0EjREw0k= =VbZm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----