Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4159E9FB581 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:50:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55762-07 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:50:27 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from oxford.xeocode.com (unknown [87.127.95.194]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8A19FB562 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:50:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=oxford.xeocode.com) by oxford.xeocode.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HiBfN-0003AO-9F; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:50:25 +0100 From: Gregory Stark To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner Cc: Simon Riggs , Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report In-Reply-To: <20070429154006.GA18593@alvh.no-ip.org> (Alvaro Herrera's message of "Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:40:06 -0400") Organization: EnterpriseDB References: <200704270313.l3R3DwF16449@momjian.us> <1177792836.3663.61.camel@silverbirch.site> <46348320.7080808@kaltenbrunner.cc> <20070429154006.GA18593@alvh.no-ip.org> X-Draft-From: ("nnimap+mail01.enterprisedb.com:INBOX.hackers" 8950) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:50:24 +0100 Message-ID: <871wi3yybj.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200704/1199 X-Sequence-Number: 102532 "Alvaro Herrera" writes: > The postponed patches can be reviewed and committed early in 8.4, instead of > at the last minute in 8.3. Given that some of those patches have been in the queue since last September is there any reason to think they'll get reviewed early in this cycle if they weren't last cycle? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com