From: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>,
	<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report
In-Reply-To: <26720.1178170239@sss.pgh.pa.us> (Tom Lane's message of "Thu, 03
	May 2007 01:30:39 -0400")
Organization: EnterpriseDB
References: <200705021046.l42Akk127514@momjian.us>
	<87k5vrh1wg.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <26720.1178170239@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 12:31:26 +0100
Message-ID: <878xc62lf5.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> You keep saying that but I think it's wrong. There are trivial patches that
>> were submitted last year that are still sitting in the queue.
>
> Um ... which ones exactly?  I don't see *anything* in the current queue
> that is utterly without issues

I didn't mean they were without issues. Only that they weren't complex patches
requiring broad knowledge of many parts of the system.

Anyways, I think we're well on our way to improving the situation so I don't
want to drag out my negativity any longer.


-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com