To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	"Greg Smith" <gsmith@gregsmith.com>,
	"Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Patch queue -> wiki
In-Reply-To: <200804050114.m351E6900485@momjian.us> (Bruce Momjian's message
	of "Fri\, 4 Apr 2008 21\:14\:06 -0400 \(EDT\)")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)
References: <200804050114.m351E6900485@momjian.us>
From: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Organization: EnterpriseDB
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:49:26 +0100
Message-ID: <87abk9dqah.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


"Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

> Basically a Wiki takes 10x more time for me to modify something, so
> unless I get another 9 people to do the same amount of work I do on
> tracking, we are going to fall behind.  I am not willing to increase the
> amount of time I already spend doing this.  Perhaps distributed over the
> community there will be 9x more time spent on tracking, but I doubt it.

On a busy day we might get 5 patches submitted or updated. That's five lines
of text to add or edit. The hard part is reading the email and figuring out
what status the patch is in. Not coincidentally the lack of that info is also
why your list isn't very helpful.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!