X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A9FD1B55F
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 18 Nov 2003 01:09:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 93829-07
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:08:42 -0400 (AST)
Received: from bob.samurai.com (bob.samurai.com [205.207.28.75])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9C5D1BB9C
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:08:38 -0400 (AST)
Received: from tokyo.samurai.com (d226-89-59.home.cgocable.net [24.226.89.59])
	by bob.samurai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A0D051E37; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:08:41 -0500 (EST)
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Release cycle length
From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311180038310.639-100000@peter.localdomain> (Peter
	Eisentraut's message of "Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:46:38 +0100 (CET)")
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311180038310.639-100000@peter.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:08:41 -0500
Message-ID: <87isliiiue.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion,
	linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200311/900
X-Sequence-Number: 47188

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> The time from release 7.3 to release 7.4 was 355 days, an all-time
> high.  We really need to shorten that.

Why is that?

-Neil