X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3D49FB21C; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:45:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39789-03; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:45:23 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from localhost.localdomain (host86-130-26-100.range86-130.btcentralplus.com [86.130.26.100]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854979FB212; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:45:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain) by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GOxtT-0004Im-M9; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:45:15 +0100 From: Gregory Stark To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout , Tom Lane , Josh Berkus , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Neil Conway , Dave Page , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki In-Reply-To: <450D5C3D.1040608@commandprompt.com> (Joshua D. Drake's message of "Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:31:25 -0700") Organization: EnterpriseDB References: <200609161225.16961.josh@agliodbs.com> <877j03y50r.fsf@enterprisedb.com> <200609161309.50052.josh@agliodbs.com> <87slirwg7w.fsf@enterprisedb.com> <450C90A0.3090105@commandprompt.com> <15070.1158455724@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060917100538.GA14893@svana.org> <450D5C3D.1040608@commandprompt.com> X-Draft-From: ("nnimap+webmail.enterprisedb.com:Inbox" 2998) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:45:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87sliqv9fo.fsf@enterprisedb.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.775 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL X-Spam-Level: ** X-Archive-Number: 200609/146 X-Sequence-Number: 10724 "Joshua D. Drake" writes: >> 1. Authorized user: is that someone with an account, or someone who has >> been authorized by someone else? > > In my mind it is someone who without threw a process of email confirmation. > Just to help stave off the amount of trolling that may happen. I guess it depends on whether you feel the larger of the project's problems is too many people trying to help who must be stopped before they do something that may need to be corrected or too few people getting past the natural barriers to being able to contribute. The former would be a great problem to have but I don't see any evidence of it. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com