Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F209FA3C5 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:59:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91141-08 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:59:05 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3439FA413 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:59:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9R5x4Jh008845 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:59:04 -0400 (EDT) To: pgsql-www@postgreSQL.org Subject: Strange anoncvs sync behavior Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:59:04 -0400 Message-ID: <8844.1193464744@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/151 X-Sequence-Number: 12738 Over an hour ago, Marc applied a "cvs tag" operation to the master CVS repository. I saw it immediately in local "cvs log" queries, but it didn't propagate to anoncvs AFAICS, because the cvsweb server never showed it. After I applied a post-tag commit (src/backend/optimizer/path/pathkeys.c a few minutes ago), the BETA2 tag showed up in cvsweb almost immediately. This might have been some weird timing glitch, but what it looked like to me was that the anoncvs update trigger doesn't recognize tag operations. Is that accurate? Is it fixable? regards, tom lane