X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150E6329E67 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 01:40:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29289-09 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:40:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E568E329E66 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 01:40:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8K0e4oR000892 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:40:04 -0400 (EDT) To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Bizarre substitution in online devel docs Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:40:04 -0400 Message-ID: <891.1095640804@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/141 X-Sequence-Number: 5211 Take a look at http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-porting.html#PLPGSQL-PORTING-EX2 The source text for this looks like || ' LIKE ''' || referrer_key.key_string || ''' THEN RETURN ''' || referrer_key.referrer_type || '''; END IF;'; but what I'm seeing on the web page is || ' LIKE ''' || referrer_key.key_string || ''' THEN RETURN ''' || "Not Your Business!"_type || '''; END IF;'; The same substitution for "referrer_key.referrer" occurs in two other places further down the page, so it seems something is actively filtering the page contents. What's even more bizarre is that I see the same thing in Bruce's build of the docs: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/plpgsql-porting.html#PLPGSQL-PORTING-EX2 but not in a locally built version. The back-version on-line docs have the same thing, eg: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/plpgsql-porting.html#PLPGSQL-PORTING-EX2 Any ideas what's doing that? I'm pretty sure no such thing was happening when I last edited this example, not many weeks ago. regards, tom lane