Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mj0wx-0008A0-96 for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:16:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mj0wv-0004UC-VF for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:16:13 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mj0wv-0004U3-Ow for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:16:13 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mj0wt-0003Ei-1v for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:16:13 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDF02EB81AC for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:16:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from s499.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9452E2969A; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:16:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from s472.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s499.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0EC1CE0CB1; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:16:10 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1] autolearn=disabled Received: from s934.loopia.se ([172.22.191.5]) by s472.loopia.se (s472.loopia.se [172.22.190.12]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HahMgNI9qhc1; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:16:06 +0100 (CET) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.193 Received: from [192.168.72.144] (customer-89-255-232-193.stosn.net [89.255.232.193]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s934.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 742F07D1A5C; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:16:06 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) Subject: Re: Notice about EDB downloads From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: <20211105141244.GA19813@momjian.us> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:16:06 +0100 Cc: Magnus Hagander , PostgreSQL WWW Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8AF33DC8-13FF-447D-A92B-D48F69BEC730@yesql.se> References: <33825241-F49E-4EA5-B34D-0DF982914F59@yesql.se> <20211105141244.GA19813@momjian.us> To: Bruce Momjian X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 5 Nov 2021, at 15:12, Bruce Momjian wrote: >=20 > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 10:28:33AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> On 4 Nov 2021, at 22:24, Magnus Hagander = wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:54 PM Daniel Gustafsson > wrote: >>=20 >>> While in there, could you also add the 14 release to the version = tables on >>> those pages? The 14 installer is available for download but the = page make it >>> seem like it's only 9.6-13 which isn't a good look. >>>=20 >>> We normally wait for the people who run that end to provide a patch = for that -- but that usually leaves us in just this situation, with = things not properly up to date >>>=20 >>> Perhaps we should see if EDB can provide a metadata file somewhere = on the site that we could scrape down regularly (say, daily) and have it = automated? >>=20 >> Since we regularly find ourselves with out of date information here = we clearly >> need to do something, right now we make it seem like 14 isn't = available for >> download a month out from the release. >>=20 >> Another option is to just remove the table alltogether and leave the = platform >> support information to the EDB landing page? Since we don't offer = direct >> downloads via deeplinks, separating the platform support info and the = actual >> download is a bit strange anyways. >=20 > Do we have that kind of chart for any other platform downloads? What > value is the chart providing, considering it looks very similar to the > EDB download page. Seems the chart is just a maintenance burden with > little value and should be removed, as suggested above. I thint it formalizes the supported OS per release in a way which the = EDB page doesn't, but I don't think it's necessarily the best place to present = this information as anyone interested would have to flip flop back and forth = between the pages while downloading. Removing it might be the best course of = action. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/