Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8782E002D for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:21:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52657-01 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:21:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49362E002C for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:21:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F0F16886A7 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:21:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52262-02; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:21:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-7-245-234.eastlink.ca [71.7.245.234]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEA6168863F; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:21:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEE55D1C4; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:21:52 -0300 (ADT) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:20:27 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Bruce Momjian cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: New email list for emergency communications Message-ID: <8B742D71C51956422ADAB679@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <200803241547.m2OFlKu15415@momjian.us> References: <200803241547.m2OFlKu15415@momjian.us> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/572 X-Sequence-Number: 14691 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just got back online ... since its so rare (as often as JD and I agree), just want to make a slight amendment to my original ... I think Bruce's idea has merit, just don't htink having it go through a personal desktop is the answer ... will bring it up on the sysadmins mailing list though ... - --On Monday, March 24, 2008 11:47:20 -0400 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> > I would like the requirements defined by the -www and sysadmins teams. >> > I don't want us to go off and create yet more infrastructure without >> > full documentation and understanding of the purpose and whether it is >> > redundant. >> > >> > This list is currently redundant as we have the resources and >> > technology already in place to deal with this. I think you are >> > attacking the wrong problem Bruce. >> >> For how often it happens, its worth nothing: I agree 100% with Joshua >> here, but, if Bruce wants to create a list on his personal domain (which, >> in itself is a failure point as it requires that *his* domain is not 100% >> perfect), it doesn't mean that anyone actually has to *use* it ... I know >> I never will, since there already exist faster, more reliable, contact >> methods ... > > I think we need a more centralized contact system than we have now. > Personally when I don't get email I am unsure who to contact (because > community email is down). The email list was a method to centralize > that. The list of possible contact methods listed confirms my point. > > -- > Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com > > + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + - -- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFH6Ckr4QvfyHIvDvMRAhVYAJ4vhlXkYxmiIVw0fvcg/pB9CbFfwQCgjcmU 3AucDB9OAeq82Q7ct1Aui5E= =o9to -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----