public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Jonathan S. Katz <[email protected]>
To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: Vik Fearing <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Karl O. Pinc <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 15:53:53 -0600
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On 12/26/23 5:40 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 10:49:16PM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
>> On 12/26/23 22:21, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 01:10:47PM -0600, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>>>>> It may be better to just say "relational".
>>>
>>>> I guess if I had to name this with no precedence, I would call it
>>>> relational/extendable, but that seems even worse that what we have.
>>>
>>> Call it an "extensible relational database"? I agree that the
>>> "object" part is out of date and no longer much of a focal point.
>>
>> Especially considering we hardly implement any of the object features at
>> all. We have table inheritance, and that's about it.
>
> "extensible relational database" works for me.
Reading [1], I can align with dropping "object-" from the text.
Currently -1 on swapping it with "extensible", given most folks describe
PostgreSQL as a relational database.
That said, I do personally describe one of PostgreSQL's best attributes
to be its "extensibility," so I could warm up to incorporating it into
"official verbiage" in the coming days.
Jonathan
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object%E2%80%93relational_database
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP_signature.asc (840B, 2-OpenPGP_signature.asc)
download
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox