Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EE59FB5FC
	for <pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:19:18 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 34326-05-5 for
	<pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:19:12 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D317A9FB70C
	for <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:19:11 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3HKJ5kM009364;
	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:19:05 -0400 (EDT)
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: log_autovacuum 
In-reply-to: <20070417151004.f59498b0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> 
References: <1173369949.3641.132.camel@silverbirch.site>
	<20070308175330.GW4715@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<1173378696.3641.162.camel@silverbirch.site>
	<20070417180633.GA15495@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<1176834315.3635.414.camel@silverbirch.site>
	<20070417184550.GC15495@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<20070417151004.f59498b0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
	message dated "Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:10:04 -0400"
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:19:04 -0400
Message-ID: <9363.1176841144@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200704/416
X-Sequence-Number: 1983

BTW, shouldn't the log entry distinguish whether this was VACUUM,
ANALYZE, or both?

			regards, tom lane