Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9211C2E2E80 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:50:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35735-03 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:50:17 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.189]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4222E014E for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:50:24 -0400 (AST) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y6so2000863tia.5 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 05:50:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.11.17 with SMTP id o17mr1196055ybi.51.1204725020511; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 05:50:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.96.5 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 05:50:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <937d27e10803050550p57c0dfa6q929d2dc922a0b709@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:50:20 +0000 From: "Dave Page" To: "Magnus Hagander" Subject: Re: List types Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <20080305132949.GP5559@svr2.hagander.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080305125551.GO5559@svr2.hagander.net> <937d27e10803050505p2875c771s19aa5d1c5fa84537@mail.gmail.com> <20080305132949.GP5559@svr2.hagander.net> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/73 X-Sequence-Number: 14192 On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:05:17PM +0000, Dave Page wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > What's the difference between "Regional lists" and "User Groups Lists"? I > > > mean, we have persian pug under regional, but sydney and portland under > > > user groups... Should we just merge these? > > > > > > (http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/) > > > > The PUGs are supposed to be groups working on face to face events etc. > > The Regionals are actually a kind of mix of language and > > region-speciifc content. > > So why is persian pug under regional? Soudns like it's either in the wrong > place, or has the wrong name... Oh, I don't know - stop asking technical questions on the www list :-p -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk