Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9522E31FA for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:20:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61519-01 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:20:07 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2787F2E2E01 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:20:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so305060ugf.49 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.91.20 with SMTP id o20mr4763165ybb.24.1205349601743; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.96.5 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <937d27e10803121220p7634837bx2672879f2607a792@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:20:01 +0000 From: "Dave Page" To: "Tom Lane" Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Move the developers wiki? Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , "Greg Smith" , PostgreSQL-development , "PostgreSQL www" In-Reply-To: <28570.1205348960@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <937d27e10803121016i45ee2e26g5232151153406575@mail.gmail.com> <20080312102553.23a735a8@commandprompt.com> <20080312174817.GH8328@alvh.no-ip.org> <28301.1205347866@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20080312115450.2daad5ff@commandprompt.com> <28570.1205348960@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/288 X-Sequence-Number: 14407 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> That's not exactly what I'd call "keeping existing links working". > > > It is if we point developer. to wiki. > > Will that break anything else (ie, is that webserver serving anything > but the wiki)? No, thats one of the reasons why I'd like to move developer - this one is not just on a dedicated apache instance, but a dedicated VM. I don't see any reason why what Greg & Josh are suggesting couldn't work - it's roughly what I had in mind anyway, except that we'd have to use a URL rewrite on developer to get it to redirect requests to wiki, as that hostname is used for other things so hijacking DNS doesn't sound sensible. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk