Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BF22E0030 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:14:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02041-03 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:14:38 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (ag-out-0708.google.com [72.14.246.244]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D702E002D for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:14:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 23so3803319agd.5 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.156.9 with SMTP id d9mr2172802ybe.116.1206195276478; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.96.5 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <937d27e10803220714q29906c2cg3ab43c9a2735f622@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:14:36 +0000 From: "Dave Page" To: "Bruce Momjian" Subject: Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , "Robert Treat" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <200803221407.m2ME7f011405@momjian.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080321173522.3afa7e96@commandprompt.com> <200803221407.m2ME7f011405@momjian.us> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/462 X-Sequence-Number: 14581 On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Everyone here seems to be in agreement. So what are the next steps? > Setup a parallel email infrastructure, test it, and switch over? What > else needs to be moved? It's not exactly that easy because there is a complex mix of email accounts, majordomo lists, anti-spam and anti-virus, and integration with the archives system to take into account. Once we have agreement from the appropriate person (who will have to agree, given that he owns the domain), the sysadmins team can start to figure out what's needed and provision the appropriate VM. Note that any new mail infrastructure *will* be managed by the sysadmin team as part of the existing FreeBSD infrastructure. Doing it any other way invalidates most of the arguments for moving it in the first place. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk