Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329832E004C for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:53:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62423-04 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:53:32 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (ag-out-0708.google.com [72.14.246.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232122E0045 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:53:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 23so3931260agd.5 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.203.8 with SMTP id a8mr2304558ybg.146.1206208411251; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.96.5 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <937d27e10803221053o46a5d4a4y5bf38d4fc7e834a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:53:31 +0000 From: "Dave Page" To: "Joshua D. Drake" Subject: Re: postgresql.org mail infrastructure Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" , "PostgreSQL www" In-Reply-To: <20080322104827.58cc0436@commandprompt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <937d27e10803220907v4d916d6dr32be3fa9a4a3129a@mail.gmail.com> <20080322173934.GB11732@alvh.no-ip.org> <20080322104827.58cc0436@commandprompt.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/491 X-Sequence-Number: 14610 On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:39:34 -0300 > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > +1 to the project -- assuming that it means a change of infrastructure > > and not necessarily of tools. I, for one, would oppose changing Mj2 > > for Mailman, for instance. (However, whether we use Sendmail or > > Postfix or something else entirely I don't care ...) > > Actually this is a good point. We really should define requirements as > part of this, let's not just do it wholesale. Here are a couple: > > * Software must be open source? > * Environment must be managed by the community > * Attempt to have admins in each of the following timezones > EST > PST > CET > * I believe with those three we have 24x7 coverage > * FreeBSD is OS? Please stick to the point of this thread. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk