Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6C22E004B for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 05:05:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00154-09 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 05:05:19 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.184]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E766D2E0041 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 05:05:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id s46so1313485rnb.3 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 01:05:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.212.14 with SMTP id k14mr2554034ybg.148.1207555518026; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 01:05:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.96.5 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 01:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <937d27e10804070105h38cdd7ffkade01b1eee360d2a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 09:05:17 +0100 From: "Dave Page" To: josh@agliodbs.com Subject: Re: Databasing sponsors Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, "Joshua D. Drake" In-Reply-To: <200804041702.26906.josh@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080403101150.56301a10@commandprompt.com> <200804041127.02090.josh@agliodbs.com> <937d27e10804041147h20040dc9jb637647a1e0261ff@mail.gmail.com> <200804041702.26906.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200804/91 X-Sequence-Number: 14839 On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Dave, > > > > What does it have to do with SPI, JPUG or Fr (as groups, not the > > individuals in them)? > > Because at the time those were our only fundraising vehicles. It was also > an open session and several people not in any of those orgs attended. Don't suppose you recall what it clashed with do you? I don't remember it at all. > Now, of course, we'd need to pull in PGUS, PGEU, and PostgreSQL.Br. No, I don't think we do - we're only interested in sponsors of postgresql.org (and possibly family, per our offlist conversation) on www.postgresql.org. The regional groups have their own websites and use funding for their own purposes, so I believe its up to them to recognise their own sponsors. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com