Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C852E00A0 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:02:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11176-03 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:02:25 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.28]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED662E0092 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:02:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so75651yxb.73 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.49.1 with SMTP id w1mr12116679ybw.25.1212422543382; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.144.11 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <937d27e10806020902q313a7c0dr9ffdb38c9325355e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:02:23 +0100 From: "Dave Page" To: "Joshua D. Drake" Subject: Re: RFC: Product directory Cc: "David Fetter" , w^3 In-Reply-To: <1212422194.12052.37.camel@jd-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <937d27e10806020130l418d1730o84de8773f1f182f5@mail.gmail.com> <20080602113349.GA8921@fetter.org> <937d27e10806020458o68717cd7sb7e0424338ff5d19@mail.gmail.com> <484411B4.4020801@commandprompt.com> <937d27e10806020846i5e4263d9sf521e74614049018@mail.gmail.com> <1212422194.12052.37.camel@jd-laptop> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200806/10 X-Sequence-Number: 15237 On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > And who is going to make sure the pricing is up to date? (hint: no one > will) I'm guessing you didn't read all of the thread? > But I am sure you have time to create a secondary table and the code for > it. I am not asking you to create all the code for sponsors, news, > events. I am asking you to use a reusable design so others can create > code for those services. That I can do. It sounded like you wanted me to get rid of all the redundant info at the same time. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com