Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983B0632462 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:24:51 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80363-07 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:24:48 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.30]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D4A632D10 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:24:48 -0400 (AST) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so332698ywh.73 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:24:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.108.5 with SMTP id k5mr792874ybm.194.1234430687076; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:24:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090211214320.W14664@hub.org> References: <499336C3.4040507@agliodbs.com> <937d27e10902111240hd7e7cc0p8f20fd3b03d989e9@mail.gmail.com> <14215.1234385050@sss.pgh.pa.us> <49933B2C.2030609@agliodbs.com> <49933BC1.30905@kaltenbrunner.cc> <49933E6B.5030401@agliodbs.com> <14942.1234387956@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20090211214320.W14664@hub.org> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:24:47 +0000 Message-ID: <937d27e10902120124p4e4cad08s6fb770ed8bb6a37@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Audio & Video? From: Dave Page To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: Tom Lane , Josh Berkus , Stefan Kaltenbrunner , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200902/62 X-Sequence-Number: 16613 On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > could do pub/av section on the ftp server easily enough ... then no one site > would be "hit" for the bandwidth ... What worries me about that is when files start to get much bigger than 100MB, or a bunch are added at once (think 2 day conference with a dozen or more hour long talks), when they get uploaded to the ftp site, within a 24 hour window we'll get around 100 mirrors all trying to rsync them at once - probably far more bandwidth than people actually viewing the stuff! We have plenty of spare hardware atm (we have 4 new boxes coming online at the moment with very good connectivity) - we can easily setup a dedicated server for this, or I kinda like Marc's YouTube idea. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com