Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688A5632FD0 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:27:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58093-05 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:27:03 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qy0-f115.google.com (mail-qy0-f115.google.com [209.85.221.115]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E5963285D for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:27:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: by qyk13 with SMTP id 13so1112491qyk.15 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:27:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.54.83 with SMTP id p19mr2288391qag.97.1239910020871; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:27:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <27966.1239908638@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <16454.1239890476@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200904161454.n3GEsxm27869@momjian.us> <937d27e10904160808w21a2ebbcs57136807df000680@mail.gmail.com> <20090416151427.GW7709@alvh.no-ip.org> <937d27e10904160827r19c50f2fg79a552fdaae96836@mail.gmail.com> <20090416135324.U84471@hub.org> <20090416165800.GY7709@alvh.no-ip.org> <20090416155223.N84471@hub.org> <27966.1239908638@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:27:00 +0100 Message-ID: <937d27e10904161227g1c0b67d6ya1e0b189b872ae3a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Archives policy From: Dave Page To: Tom Lane Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Alvaro Herrera , Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL www Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.073 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.073 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200904/94 X-Sequence-Number: 16961 On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" writes: >> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> (and I don't think we're going to attempt to delete pornographic >>> messages posted months ago -- if anything of the sort happens, action i= s >>> going to be taken pretty hastily). > >> Agreed ... there isn't any reason why someone 'internally' doesn't notic= e >> it from jus scanning the lists ... > > I think by far the most likely problem scenario is that someone claims > to hold copyright on something-or-other in an old message and files a > DMCA takedown notice against it. =A0AFAICT the standard of proof in such > cases is "guilty until proven innocent", so we'd probably have to cave > rather than argue about it. =A0How are the copyright laws in Canada these > days? I don't think it's worth worrying about that scenario unless it happens - and if it does, one of us non-usians can simply point archives.postgresql.org at the master server in Panama. Or immediately remove the message if it is a legitimate complaint about something we don't want on the archives anyway. --=20 Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com