X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9D69DCB96 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:12:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32829-03 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:12:45 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7D29DCAB3 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:12:40 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jASEChSs009399; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:12:44 -0500 (EST) To: "Magnus Hagander" cc: "Neil Conway" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, "Simon Riggs" Subject: Re: Security information page In-reply-to: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7C5F@algol.sollentuna.se> References: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7C5F@algol.sollentuna.se> Comments: In-reply-to "Magnus Hagander" message dated "Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:29:24 +0100" Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:12:43 -0500 Message-ID: <9398.1133187163@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004] X-Spam-Score: 0.004 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/176 X-Sequence-Number: 8891 "Magnus Hagander" writes: >> Personally I think we shouldn't make the latter >> claim, anyway: for example, whether COALESCE(NULL, NULL) >> dumping core (fixed in 8.0.3) is a "security issue" >> is often in the eye of the beholder. > If we (the PGDG) beleive that is a security issue, it should be on the > list. And it should be back-patched to other stable branches - has this > been done? 2005-04-10 16:57 tgl * src/backend/optimizer/util/: clauses.c (REL7_4_STABLE), clauses.c (REL8_0_STABLE), clauses.c: Make constant-folding produce sane output for COALESCE(NULL,NULL), that is a plain NULL and not a COALESCE with no inputs. Fixes crash reported by Michael Williamson. It wasn't back-patched further because earlier versions don't have the bug. In general, I think we consider any potential server core dump to be a security issue, if it can be provoked by unprivileged users. Even if it's not exploitable in any other way, denial-of-service is still a security concern. regards, tom lane