X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C8F3A57CA for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:53:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38651-06 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:53:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6803A5781 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:53:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB2HrN3l009581; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:53:24 -0500 (EST) To: Robert Treat Cc: Josh Berkus , PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List Subject: Re: Links for press page ... where will these things be? In-reply-to: <200412020857.00384.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> References: <200412011530.27126.josh@agliodbs.com> <200412020022.07167.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <200412012230.07961.josh@agliodbs.com> <200412020857.00384.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Treat message dated "Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:57:00 -0500" Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:53:23 -0500 Message-ID: <9580.1102010003@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/23 X-Sequence-Number: 6142 Robert Treat writes: > On Thursday 02 December 2004 01:30, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> http://developer.postgresql.org/~momjian/HISTORY.html >> >> Presumably these will be somewhere in the new official docs once 8.0 is >> canned? > I only suggested that since it is what we linked to in the 7.4 press release, > but if the information is duplicated in the docs I've no problem linking > there instead. Can you verify the info at the above URL with what is in the > 7.4 docs? Yeah, that is just a repackaging of the Release Notes section of the docs. It would be reasonable to point to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/release.html instead. You could also make an argument for pointing to the development-tip version of the release notes: http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/release.html because it is more likely to be up-to-date than any static copy of the documentation. regards, tom lane