X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4724B9DCB0B; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:44:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35724-09; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:44:15 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671FE9DCAB3; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:44:09 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jASEiDnO009663; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:44:13 -0500 (EST) To: "Marc G. Fournier" cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, pgsql-core@postgresql.org Subject: BTW, the lists are working beautifully Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:44:13 -0500 Message-ID: <9662.1133189053@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004] X-Spam-Score: 0.004 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/177 X-Sequence-Number: 8892 Just in case you thought anyone hadn't noticed: the mailing lists have been performing stunningly well since you fixed things the middle of last week. I'm routinely seeing sub-one-minute turnaround, even on pg-general which has been a dog for so long. Nice work. regards, tom lane