X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D8F9DC84E
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:53:26 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 98875-08
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:53:22 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C619DC82A
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:53:20 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0GHrJ0i009812;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:53:19 -0500 (EST)
To: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" list 
In-reply-to: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103D7C2@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
References: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103D7C2@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
Comments: In-reply-to "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
	message dated "Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:23:07 +0000"
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:53:19 -0500
Message-ID: <9811.1137433999@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.089 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089]
X-Spam-Score: 0.089
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200601/122
X-Sequence-Number: 9310

"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> Done - will appear next time the indexes regenerate.

Looks great, thanks.

			regards, tom lane