Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3671C1BFF91D for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:48:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from zql.com ([206.222.31.58]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SGG5U-0000eq-15 for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:48:52 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by zql.com with smtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1SGG5H-0005xg-9Z; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:48:39 -0400 From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Stopping link spam on the lists X-PGP-Key: 2529 DF6A B8F7 9407 E944 45B4 BC9B 9067 1496 4AC8 X-Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 In-Reply-To: <6881.1333731053@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 20:48:39 -0000 X-Mailer: JoyMail 2.4.0 Message-ID: <9b3dc19eca1384479d9f806e2233e2f4@biglumber.com> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/5 X-Sequence-Number: 20579 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > Seems like we are getting several of these per day now. Can't we > moderate them away? I'd humbly suggest that anything with > X-Pg-Spam-Score above about 3 ought to be held for moderation. +1 > And another thing I'd be in favor of is forcibly unsubscribing any > account seen to have sent one of these. +1, but I wonder if that matters - are these compromised accounts, or simply throwaway ones? I wonder if the low level of complaints is because other people are filtering these out. For example, I've not seen any spam from the lists in years, due to the filtering that happens betwixt postgresql.org -> turnstep.com. :) - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201204061648 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAk9/VpQACgkQvJuQZxSWSshk9ACg0ZjYcnCmDu+HBqW1IQa6n3Zm 6TYAoMEYroTqGL6ovq0/ICQnmjNaR5kl =wPYK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----