Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62C49FB287; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:27:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97267-01; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:27:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7899FB284; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:27:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E404148CB96; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:26:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38004-04; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:26:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E6248C5C6; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:26:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A775F8FA; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:27:12 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:27:12 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Andrew Dunstan , Dave Page cc: Heikki Linnakangas , Simon Riggs , Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <46352C6D.1020402@dunslane.net> References: <200704270313.l3R3DwF16449@momjian.us> <1177792836.3663.61.camel@silverbirch.site> <46349EF4.2010304@enterprisedb.com> <4634EC25.6010104@postgresql.org> <46352C6D.1020402@dunslane.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200704/1220 X-Sequence-Number: 102553 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Sunday, April 29, 2007 19:38:21 -0400 Andrew Dunstan wrote: > patches held over from feature freeze from the previous > release will be reviewed within two months of the tree re-opening a. why 2 months? shouldn't they be given priority, period? b. what happens after 2 months? we delete them? - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGNVQA4QvfyHIvDvMRAordAJ9SDrMHFumGNynXVjpdjlR5WoMfAgCgt1Xe +7jMjrOUODmEK+glmGyrHYA= =SgPr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----