Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80811723EDA for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 13:12:07 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RSAw2-0000G6-K6 for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:12:07 +0000 Received: by vcbfk1 with SMTP id fk1so4846105vcb.19 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:11:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.117.76 with SMTP id p12mr413357vcq.130.1321809114064; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:11:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from solid-ph33r.home (pool-108-46-134-156.nycmny.fios.verizon.net. [108.46.134.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f7sm10508814vdj.13.2011.11.20.09.11.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:11:53 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: PostgreSQL website redesign Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Jonathan S. Katz" In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:11:50 -0500 Cc: "w^3" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Thom Brown X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Archive-Number: 201111/30 X-Sequence-Number: 20306 Going to try answering the proposed questions: > - what is the website's target audience? I think this is broken down into groups: 1. Potentials Users - people evaluating using Postgres for professional = / academic / personal purposes. They need to feel there is a concise = way to understand what Postgres is used for and why to use it, and be = able to easily find all the details to answer their questions 2. Ongoing Users - people who are already using Postgres and need to = find resources to solve their problems (i.e. docs), but also can find a = reason to be more active in the community 3. Community - those active in the project, making sure they have easy = access to all community resources available > - how do we wish to be perceived? (e.g. traditional, modern, friendly, > professional etc.) Clean, professional, resourceful. More professional adoption of = Postgres =3D> more support for the community =3D> more contributions to = the project > - what do we hope to achieve with the website design? > - what new opportunities does this present us with? Even though I agree that the PG website layout is good and really it = just needs "some paint," with a redesign there will most likely be = layout changes because of minor tweaks. Hopefully they can be limited, = but if there would be any layout change I would suggest it would be the = homepage, specifically with readability. The easiest part to address is the font size, but that would push a lot = of what we have already out on it of the viewing pane. But this presents = us with an opportunity: the first paragraph should be a brief = description about what Postgres is and why you should use it. If you go = to any of the NoSQL database sites, the first thing you read on them is = what their database is, what it's features / differentiators are, and = where to download it. To find that info on the Postgres site, you have = to go one-click in, and even then, the most concise description is on = the "About" page, which in a lot of sites today, is used more for a = historical perspective. A clear message on the homepage on why Postgres is and why you should = use it, coupled with the download links, info on news / events / blogs, = would be good, and perhaps have a link to testimonials on a different = page. This also assumes we make the page a bit more readable, i.e. with = a larger font all-around. > - what usability problems do we currently have that the redesign could = address? I actually think the site is usable as is :-) But perhaps someone who is = a UX expert with less familiarity with the project could give a better = opinion on that. Best, Jonathan=