public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:05:07 -0300
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This is where I hate debugging email issues ... Bruce IMd me about this, I
looked around and the only problem that I could see was that the caching DNS
server within the VPS itself was still reporting one scanner, so I restarted
named, and postfix after to clear out any caches it might have, and mail
started flowing again ...
The only thing I have in the log file is:
Nov 1 14:22:41 postgresql postfix/smtpd[26360]: E4E039FC8E6:
client=hub.org[200.46.204.220]
Nov 1 14:22:41 postgresql postfix/cleanup[73513]: E4E039FC8E6:
message-id=<[email protected]>
Nov 1 14:23:58 postgresql postfix/qmgr[7655]: E4E039FC8E6:
from=<[email protected]>, size=3553, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Nov 1 16:12:19 postgresql postfix/smtp[51424]: E4E039FC8E6:
to=<[email protected]>,
orig_to=<[email protected]>, relay=maia.hub.org[200.46.204.184]:10024,
conn_use=7, delay=6578, delays=78/6496/0.01/3.9, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250
2.6.0 Ok, id=62395-04-7, from MTA: 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 9E4B49FC802)
Nov 1 16:12:19 postgresql postfix/qmgr[7655]: E4E039FC8E6: removed
Which shows the 'delay', but, there are no errors on the scanner server, nor
did I touch either of htem to fix the problem ...
so it looks like the scanner received it and hung trying to send it back, until
I reset the receiving side, whereby it finished ..
But there is nothing on either side to indicate a problem ... but restarting
postfix 'unstuck' it ...
- --On Thursday, November 01, 2007 15:23:12 -0400 Tom Lane <[email protected]>
wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[email protected]> writes:
>> But, again, it would be interesting to look at a specific one, with
>> message-id, and see what the logs show for reasons of delays ...
>
> Well, the current problems seem to be entirely inside hub.org, and so
> all this banter about DNS etc seems not relevant. A handy example is
> this same message I'm replying to, which seems to have been hung up
> for 2.5 hours:
>
> Received: from maia-2.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187] (may be
> forged)) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lA1JCPC2010552
> for <[email protected]>; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:12:26 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
> by maia-2.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912252C9544
> for <[email protected]>; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:12:22 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184])
> by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4B49FC802
> for <[email protected]>; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:12:18
> -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
> by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
> with ESMTP id 62395-04-7 for <[email protected]>;
> Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:12:11 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220])
> by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E039FC8E6
> for <[email protected]>; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 14:22:40 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184])
> by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A428DB475C8
> for <[email protected]>; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:43:35 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220])
> by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
> with ESMTP id 56221-03; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:43:01 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-137-93-67.eastlink.ca [24.137.93.67])
> by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0BCB47581;
> Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:43:02 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2])
> by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2C34E165;
> Thu, 1 Nov 2007 13:43:02 -0300 (ADT)
> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:42:31 -0300
> From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[email protected]>
> To: "Joshua D. Drake" <[email protected]>
> cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>,
> Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] what is up with the PG mailing lists?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> In-Reply-To: <20071101092806.3b1fa452@scratch>
> References: <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]> <20071101080959.49f3087b@scratch>
> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
> <20071101092806.3b1fa452@scratch> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
> X-Mailing-List: pgsql-www
> List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www;
> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?body=help>
> List-ID: <pgsql-www.postgresql.org>
> List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]>
> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=sub%20pgsql-www>
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-www>
> Precedence: bulk
> Sender: [email protected]
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [email protected] MSN . [email protected]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHKk2T4QvfyHIvDvMRAsA/AKCFj3U3RNAIvehPULV8S8PfbgeLlwCcDZSp
qCWZnSOOTTQydS1Tk+e1Vs8=
=DFh4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
view thread (59+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox