Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6B09FB25F; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:28:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60072-08; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:28:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734679FB59C; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:28:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0623285C907; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:28:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75423-09; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:28:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E9285C906; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:28:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A25E5C1BA; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:28:21 -0300 (ADT) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:28:21 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Tom Lane , Magnus Hagander , Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20070411161015.GB8704@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <7550.1176268648@sss.pgh.pa.us> <461C918A.4040701@postgresql.org> <20070411082702.GA1810@svr2.hagander.net> <14128.1176301582@sss.pgh.pa.us> <6EFFA29CD4051EFDB87937F6@ganymede.hub.org> <20070411161015.GB8704@alvh.no-ip.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.7 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200704/55 X-Sequence-Number: 11805 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:10:15 -0400 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> I checked both of those last night when you reported it ... there was one >> spam in -bugs and a few from Kris Kennedy in -hackers, but that was it ... > > I think the problem is that it shouldn't just be checked when somebody > complains, but on a periodical basis. My point was that obviously someone has been checking, since there was only a couple in -hackers that were <24hr old, and -bugs had nothing but one spam ... > >> - --On Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:26:22 -0400 Tom Lane >> wrote: >> >> > Magnus Hagander writes: >> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:43:06AM +0100, Dave Page wrote: >> >>> Which lists are slow? >> > >> >> In my case, -patches and -committers. Looking at the thread I *think* Tom >> >> was referring to, also -hackers. >> > >> > At the time I was particularly concerned about -hackers and -bugs, but >> > I'm not sure which lists have the issue overall. I regularly notice >> > batches of two-or-three-day-old messages being released together, >> > perhaps several times a week, and hadn't paid any particular attention >> > to which lists they were on. I file all the PG lists I read (which is >> > most of them) into one folder, so it all kinda blurs together ... but >> > I think -bugs is in need of more attention because it's particularly >> > likely to get submissions from non-subscribers. > > -- > Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGHRq14QvfyHIvDvMRAigqAJ9JW8gb1NhDUxFEdUDghR0lx2v6TwCfU9WA aWFCcUoDZ9glLmxbLP3sR+Y= =V5F3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----