Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215CB9FB6A4; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:20:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74452-02; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:20:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43619FB5D5; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:20:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3A3B46D4D; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:20:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73597-05; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:20:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-89-241-126.eastlink.ca [24.89.241.126]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58217B46827; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:20:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [192.168.1.3]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3EF8D958; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:20:14 -0300 (ADT) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:20:14 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Jim Nasby , Magnus Hagander cc: Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Advocacy wiki Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <689CC6B9-F8AC-426C-B595-7DA7AB2D3E8C@decibel.org> References: <20070725054838.71190DCC143@svr2.hagander.net> <46A700A3.40903@postgresql.org> <20070725081046.GA5612@svr2.hagander.net> <689CC6B9-F8AC-426C-B595-7DA7AB2D3E8C@decibel.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/55 X-Sequence-Number: 12202 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, July 25, 2007 18:12:50 -0700 Jim Nasby wrote: > My intention was indeed that general community members could make use of > this. I want to make it easier for other people to advocate PostgreSQL, and > part of that is providing a place where they can upload presentations, > photos, etc. This is something that should be collaborative in nature, so I > don't think techdocs is a good place for it. I'd like to move the developer wiki to it own VPS, and out of the core developer one, just to save against potential 'web based security holes' ... would it be an idea ot setup a seperate 'advocacy wiki', along the lines of what you are suggesting (with suitable moderation / review) from the developer one, which would remian closed? And, do you have the time / energy to actually moderate such a beast ... I think one of the bigger fears is ppl uploading mis-information into such an "official wiki", and I think that fear is fairly justified with the amount of spam-bots going around filling in forms left-right-and-center ... Personally, I can see the benefit of what you are suggesting, but do think that a certain amount of control / moderation is required to keep it clean and accurate ... then again, maybe we want Al Dev back again? For those that don't know the name, he into 'creative technical writing' that is akin to 'the aliens are coming' :) - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGqATe4QvfyHIvDvMRArV2AKCQUheJtd0rR3y0uxsNM+ZXmqdC1wCfSKYW wpqfyZWv1qx9ciQEHUcBZ0w= =1Yux -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----