X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A8B9DCAA5;
	Sat,  3 Dec 2005 17:58:20 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 86769-09; Sat,  3 Dec 2005 17:58:17 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net
	[194.217.242.86])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6ED9DCA94;
	Sat,  3 Dec 2005 17:58:18 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34]
	helo=vale-housing.co.uk)
	by anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
	id 1EifOd-000Dfw-L1; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 21:58:19 +0000
Received: from 84.13.74.46 ([84.13.74.46]) by ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
	([192.168.1.106]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ;
	Sat,  3 Dec 2005 21:58:19 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.1.051004
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 21:58:18 +0000
Subject: Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL
From: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: <josh@postgresql.org>
CC: <jd@commandprompt.com>, <jnasby@pervasive.com>, <gevik@xs4all.nl>,
	<denis@enterprisedb.com>, <syara@greenplum.com>, <scrappy@hub.org>,
	<paul.oh@sun.com>, <andya@enterprisedb.com>, <sslezak@pervasive.com>,
	<kennisgres-pgdn@pgfoundry.org>, <shahzadk@enterprisedb.com>,
	<pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Message-ID: <BFB7C57A.6F6B%dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL
	Knowledge Base
Thread-Index: AcX4VKsD6VpjzmRHEdqi0QARJHpWaA==
In-Reply-To: <200512031345.40581.josh@postgresql.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.253 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000,
	RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253]
X-Spam-Score: 1.253
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Archive-Number: 200512/63
X-Sequence-Number: 9004




On 3/12/05 9:45 pm, "Josh Berkus" <josh@postgresql.org> wrote:

> Dave,
> 
>> Of course, that doesn't mean that this group cannot decide whether or
>> not to make that proposal.
> 
> Right, the proposal would be "www.postgresql.org or kb.postgresql.org".
> Presumably, the WWW group would decide on www.postgresql.org.

Not necessarily - the group has changed a lot since the decision was
originally made. I can only say that I will argue against having a separate
site.

Regards, Dave