X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED54D9DD8FF; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:40:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57557-04; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:40:38 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305559DD8DF; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:40:35 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1Ext8W-000Am6-2M; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:40:36 +0000 Received: from 192.168.7.8 ([192.168.7.8]) by ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk ([192.168.1.106]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:40:36 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.1.051004 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:40:56 +0000 Subject: Re: Infrastructure monitoring From: Dave Page To: John Hansen , "Joshua D. Drake" CC: Guido Barosio , "Marc G. Fournier" , Josh Berkus , , "Jim C. Nasby" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Infrastructure monitoring Thread-Index: AcYZUNQ0jkaEfQUqROSmRWpcJz0WlAAAPM+wAABa9ik= In-Reply-To: <34F8F335525CB14C95CF92BE2194858E01285D@pdc.geeknet.com.au> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.334 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.334] X-Spam-Score: 0.334 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/108 X-Sequence-Number: 9296 On 14/1/06 21:37, "John Hansen" wrote: > Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd@commandprompt.com] Wrote > >> Sure we could help and we are happy to. John what types of >> machines are we talking about here? > > You will need an x86-32 (Preferably SMP) with at least 2G of ram running > linux. > (Gentoo is known to work). > ASPseek currently uses 11G of HD space for the search. What sort of storage are you currently running? How many spindles etc? Regards, Dave.