X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9613B9DD8DF; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:54:58 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65759-02; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:54:59 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EC79DD8DB; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:54:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1ExtMP-0002Xw-Ew; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:54:57 +0000 Received: from 84.13.244.132 ([84.13.244.132]) by ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk ([192.168.1.106]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:54:57 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.1.051004 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:55:17 +0000 Subject: Re: Infrastructure monitoring From: Dave Page To: Josh Berkus CC: Magnus Hagander , "Marc G. Fournier" , John Hansen , , "Jim C. Nasby" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Infrastructure monitoring Thread-Index: AcYZVTR6cwv0aoVIEdqebgARJHpWaA== In-Reply-To: <200601141349.59604.josh@agliodbs.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.325 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253] X-Spam-Score: 1.325 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200601/110 X-Sequence-Number: 9298 On 14/1/06 21:49, "Josh Berkus" wrote: > Dave, > >>> For those of you who haven't seen Hyperic, think of Nagios with a fancy >>> web UI including notification management, scheduled tasks, historical >>> reporting, and specific monitioring tools for PostgreSQL databases and >>> other common applications. As a comparison, Nagios::Hyperic --> >>> ed::vi or amanda::Arkieka >> >> Which is all very nice but what would any of those features give us that we >> have any use for? > > Hey, it's your bag ... if you don't want it, I won't ask about setting it up. OK, well unless anyone else disagrees - thanks, but no thanks. I honestly can't see what we would gain. Regards, Dave.