X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C789FA279; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:07:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91725-07; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:07:13 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384F89F944D; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:07:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1FgRMU-000M9O-28; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:07:10 +0000 Received: from 84.13.244.139 ([84.13.244.139]) by ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk ([192.168.1.106]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:07:10 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:09:49 +0100 Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] One line new items From: Dave Page To: Bruce Momjian , "Joshua D. Drake" CC: "Marc G. Fournier" , Martin Marques , PostgreSQL WWW , PostgreSQL Advocacy Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] [pgsql-advocacy] One line new items Thread-Index: AcZ54QEBS880mKUjSh2PFL5JeghwWQABHa/E In-Reply-To: <200605171837.k4HIbTr15024@candle.pha.pa.us> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3230741389_47248" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200605/104 X-Sequence-Number: 10067 > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3230741389_47248 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable On 17/5/06 19:37, "Bruce Momjian" wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> > >> > I am arguing that more needs to be in the press release for us to acce= pt >> it. >=20 > Agreed. >=20 I don=B9t disagree, however at the moment we don=B9t have any actual policy on what we should and shouldn=B9t approve. The only =8Crule=B9 that tends to get actively enforced (other than rejecting irrelevant stuff) is that we only have one product release news item per company every 6 weeks on average. It will be on the web team meeting agenda at the conference to discuss a more formal policy to be published on the website. Comments and ideas would be welcome of course. Regards, Dave. --B_3230741389_47248 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [pgsql-www] [pgsql-advocacy] One line new items


On 17/5/06 19:37, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> = wrote:

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> I am arguing that more needs to be in the press release for us to acce= pt it.

Agreed.

I don’t disagree, however at the moment we don’t= have any actual policy on what we should and shouldn’t approve. The o= nly ‘rule’ that tends to get actively enforced (other than rejec= ting irrelevant stuff) is that we only have one product release news item pe= r company every 6 weeks on average.

It will be on the web team meeting agenda at the conference to discuss a mo= re formal policy to be published on the website. Comments and ideas would be= welcome of course.

Regards, Dave. --B_3230741389_47248--