X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ECB9FB28C for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:15:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98282-01 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:15:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93449FB274 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:15:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1GD6GA-000BWe-6h for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:15:38 +0000 Received: from 82.3.102.244 ([82.3.102.244]) by ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk ([192.168.1.106]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:15:37 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:20:08 +0100 Subject: Re: Postgres Wiki From: Dave Page To: Devrim GUNDUZ , Greg Sabino Mullane CC: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] Postgres Wiki Thread-Index: AcbAewBrqJUp1Xg8RRusGpVpU8xqaAANZT+6 In-Reply-To: <1155653805.2726.54.camel@laptop.gunduz.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200608/100 X-Sequence-Number: 10491 On 15/8/06 15:56, "Devrim GUNDUZ" wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 12:15 +0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: >> >> For better or worse, the Postgres Wiki is now up and running: >> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org > > Great! I pushed RPM Installation article there. I'll report you if I > experience problems. Please remove these items, The whole point of this wiki was to be used a whiteboard for *developers* to hash out plans for development work and code. It was definitely *not* supposed to be for end user documentation, which should be on the techdocs area of the main site. This also means of course that write access to the wiki should be controlled and restricted to developers. Who will be doing that? Regards, Dave.