X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47B99FB53D for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:23:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41053-01 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:23:37 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEEA9FB539 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:23:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([194.217.48.34] helo=vale-housing.co.uk) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1GJb5b-000Bjp-5k for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:23:35 +0000 Received: from 89.240.228.119 ([89.240.228.119]) by ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk ([192.168.1.106]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 19:23:35 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 20:28:27 +0100 Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta From: Dave Page To: Martijn van Oosterhout CC: Lukas Kahwe Smith , Peter Eisentraut , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [HACKERS] Getting a move on for 8.2 beta Thread-Index: AcbOxEjRo/UkliktSJehgKzu331E6gAAa3pw In-Reply-To: <20060902191614.GC29353@svana.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200609/173 X-Sequence-Number: 89702 On 2/9/06 20:16, "Martijn van Oosterhout" wrote: > On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 06:38:30PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: >> The wiki will be going shortly as it's not been setup in the way that was >> agreed, nor is it being used for it's intended purpose. I'll put it right >> when I get time from dealing with releases of everything I seem to be >> involved in. > > I beleive the idea was to not make the site editable by the public? > Does't that kind of defeat the purpose of getting more people to > takeover work? That was one of the more flexible points as far as I'm concerned. What was more important was to make it clear it was a *developer* resource and not an alternative techdocs site or in fact a site intended in any way for end users. See my next email for more... Regards, Dave.