Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9FB2E0131 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92478-05 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77362E0108 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1711201C1E for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93680-03; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-7-245-234.eastlink.ca [71.7.245.234]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7262F120162B; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138953BCF4; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:43 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:10 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Alvaro Herrera , "Joshua D. Drake" cc: Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Email not searchable in our archives Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20080312010346.GE6737@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <200803112135.m2BLZ6625071@momjian.us> <20080311220224.GC6737@alvh.no-ip.org> <20080311152012.3bd779b9@jd-laptop> <20080312010346.GE6737@alvh.no-ip.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/237 X-Sequence-Number: 14356 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alvaro, have you checked with the mhonarc folks about the From-line issue? - --On Tuesday, March 11, 2008 22:03:46 -0300 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> I am wondering if we should bail out of Mhonarc all together. Do we >> actually need it? We have the actual mbox files right? Couldn't we >> build our own parser for whatever? >> >> As a note, mailman also uses mbox files. We could try its archive >> generation capability. > > Mailman archives are just as crappy, if not crappier. And they know it. > It's based on Hypermail; I note that Hypermail's latest version happened > on 2003. The Mailman guys are rethinking the issue; see > http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/ModernArchiving > > Somebody suggests Lurker as one alternative: > http://lurker.sourceforge.net/ > > It is a very different interface. Perhaps we could try it as an > experiment. I have seen the Debian lists under it and it feels really > martian. > > I don't want to lose Mhonarc, at least not for the moment. It is > powerful and customizable and has served us reasonably well for a very > long time. (Longer than most of us, actually.) > > -- > Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support > > -- > Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFH1zEy4QvfyHIvDvMRAiHVAJ9JKBeJueMskm4TwHGyL0y48PIELQCgzC4N BhGEZe2qt4oyrLnWsjFVy04= =ZjTJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----