X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626969FD187 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:33:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70332-04 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:33:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:22:14.089998 by SQLgrey- Received: from svr4.postgresql.org (svr4.postgresql.org [66.98.251.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB2B9FD183 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:33:12 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.3 Received: from bdc.geeknet.com.au (gateway.geeknet.com.au [210.8.38.58]) by svr4.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0F45AF8AE for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:10:56 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: PostgreSQL web site Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:10:46 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <15501.1156790439@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL web site Thread-Index: AcbK0YGzLCS+VM2cRPae9NiIi/Q9DwAAuzUQ From: "John Hansen" To: "Tom Lane" , "Magnus Hagander" Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , "Naz Gassiep" , X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/131 X-Sequence-Number: 10522 Tom Lane Wrote: >"Magnus Hagander" writes: >>> Actually that is a very good question... why are we not using=20 >>> mod_deflate? > >> Good question. It's definitly worth investigating. > > What are we talking about here --- some hack to make users' web = browsers decompress pages on-the-fly? How much > does that slow down = the browsing experience, if you've got an old slow PC? (I can believe = that if you've got a > fast PC and a slow internet connection, it could = make things faster overall ... but the breakeven point is not=20 > obvious.) What are the odds that people using older browsers will be = locked out entirely? Documents are only compressed if the browser requests one, so nobody = would get locked out. And for the odd users with a slow PC, they would probably already have = cofigured their browser so it doesn't request compressed documents. Kind Regards, John