Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5506FED3 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 05:51:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SguA1-0004rW-Qq for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:51:42 +0000 Received: by vbbff1 with SMTP id ff1so3200552vbb.19 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 01:51:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=yonFCrPIZU3JQw7tnqrzmQkZOoBrcVZF6OzoJeNyMRk=; b=eFp2l94KfW9VxVwd7Y4Mf4u9YGehaN2xA+TOA+xjzz+qWAjYyIK6Hsp0Ovh5KtmsFk BZ4/rfmI/s9XIOpBNWuP8VGgjj5ZB29hli4PKVhfiXupKSX0eCrE0ZhDSzJBBNULj5st vo0Li877A9U2nM7aiom7zq/WbZM4jNdjS2iCQhg1mt5O+EsFCJilenGEDU8u5ylCVZgL 6jsqDCldX60fo2antZH7D/kdaqnuu+vxpk5zNL2CwQaKCtZnmHzrRMJeKi9SzY6lNxck 9bQ3XTm07U5D7oLUoiWDIITuFV/u0UQgUlAAHveQjD4cAny2rN/ybuI3xaAOpOfk9tZY jrUw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.29.69 with SMTP id i5mr5559278vdh.84.1340095888705; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 01:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.182.168 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 01:51:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FDDAA9F0200002500048597@gw.wicourts.gov> <27201.1339951215@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1340005330.3923.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:51:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some restructuring of the download section From: Dave Page To: Guillaume Lelarge Cc: Magnus Hagander , Tom Lane , Kevin Grittner , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn/CSdB/a97MvJR94wh2f0sB+dWhkq/5TFrx7lhJDMhqphmghLHm1iChfh9t6ZhecIpj49O X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201206/49 X-Sequence-Number: 20743 On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > >> Yeah. But it's a good point that since they are different, I should >> add info to each of the pages saying exactly how it behaves on that >> specific platform. > > I'm not sure this is really our responsibility. The package maintainer > should have a webpage explaining how his packages work. It is our responsibility to some extent (unfortunately), and is precisely what's driven this and previous designs of these pages. We get too many confused users emailing us if it's not crystal clear how they should install and setup binary packages (that's why the installers were at the top of the page; they made it extremely simple to get up and running for those that didn't bother to read past the first couple of lines of text). -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company