MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B6519764-CE1F-4DD6-A830-D239A4027546@excoventures.com>
References: <B6519764-CE1F-4DD6-A830-D239A4027546@excoventures.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:02:46 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CA+OCxowpdB1J-jXy4WkQXuJZjPSHHWqAEEJrpZyGU+8jbUyHZA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sponsorship Page Language
From: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
To: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org

Hi

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Jonathan S. Katz
<jonathan.katz@excoventures.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When looking at the sponsorship page
> (http://www.postgresql.org/about/sponsors/) I noticed a few things regarding
> the language that I've attempted to clean up with this patch.
>
> The first regards the ordering of the sponsors - they are ordered randomly,
> not alphabetically, so I corrected the language up top.

I would think a better option would be to fix the ordering so the page
works as intended.

> The second has to do with the language on the bottom of the page discussing
> the sponsorship levels and selection process.  I reworded the sentences to
> more clearly state the purpose of the sponsorship levels are and how they
> are selected, maintaing a link to the guidelines on the wiki.

The wording there was pretty carefully chosen after a long discussion
in the sponsor committee, so it shouldn't be changed on a whim. That
said, I don't actually think your wording is an improvement (though, I
may be biased as if memory serves I wrote that's there now).

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www