Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Ahz-0007zD-Hf for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:31:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Ahz-0008Rv-0L for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:31:03 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Ahy-0008Qs-CR for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:31:02 +0000 Received: from mail-ia0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c02::230]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Ahv-0001T4-NK for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:31:01 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i18so1988429iac.7 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:30:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=4t6rq8kQVle8LvTgHx0eamPN/tUjWbxlxrjPrZW9jG4=; b=Q0ekEFnYRST2VlZnuZa9kbFLJrQVb9XuyHAwbFslUB5LRFxw5+VT0REq5V6/bDME7Y ouihnRJeSA5eTF7o2TkmrdHPbE+iACAaR9IiqKzT7NoAgwyaA0yaOiPLEjt3JURuQdAY oXMEFHWnMC53DKmNzuzGt2EkJ71VKMk3wnFDm9JG2+GAKiNl98zkjxoFacC3bEuO/brx kC69gAmr5izeUBd3gFg0pF25eNHS1+HQWWSkBo22wnpdmi8SDNk3bCu9g/U8LQq3A6AQ a978p8fFPPwDJVkLNrIU2g9KWokTEW/4HxpE6e8rZUq8wk4ME2PD6C1NqHQ6zGobruxf waQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.140.42 with SMTP id rd10mr8614681igb.78.1360179056881; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:30:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.21.202 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:30:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5112AF0E.2090708@agliodbs.com> References: <50EEA591.3030905@dalibo.info> <50EF4E25.2030509@2ndQuadrant.it> <50EFDDBB.6080109@dalibo.info> <50F09E23.90802@agliodbs.com> <50F445E5.6020601@agliodbs.com> <50F5D37D.7020900@2ndQuadrant.it> <50F5D87F.8060906@agliodbs.com> <50F5D8F6.5020406@agliodbs.com> <50F82411.1020000@2ndQuadrant.it> <5112AF0E.2090708@agliodbs.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:30:56 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Training approval policy on pg.org From: Dave Page To: Josh Berkus Cc: Gabriele Bartolini , PostgreSQL WWW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlW5X2tIq3WKF1qvraWljtPha/1ATf+lHUgsoUEI5aglN9Yshtz+P5QZ+MyVyNGqmAW+WGR X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-www Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 01/31/2013 08:03 AM, Dave Page wrote: >> Following a quick discussion with Magnus, I've approved all the rest. >> It's clear that the vast majority of folks here support allowing much >> more training than we currently do, and as it stands, the policy >> actually says the moderators may reject more than 4 posts per quarter >> at their discretion, i.e. accept by default. > > Well, more training than we currently do *except for one training > provider*. I was just checking, and that provider is still posting. > I'd like, as a moderator, to stick to the policy that we reject more > than 4 posts per quarter from CertFirst due to the simple reason that, > as reported, they cancel/reschedule a high proportion of their trainings. > > For that matter, if we received a similar report about any other > training provider, I think we should follow the same policy. Works for > everybody? Works for me. Now whether we'll all remember when it matters of course... -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www