Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06016AD7E2F for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:25:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SgFTg-0003zm-W3 for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:25:17 +0000 Received: by vcbf11 with SMTP id f11so2290728vcb.19 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 06:25:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=11pT6VdbGPjaIuIWfyc9XskODszVTV5X2PGqVorTOwc=; b=FU36/mrHaISaRWSz0wVZklPx2KwkvbxAYdV5o/nnxar8tOgaDo1vfqAHjLQxlSv8so g0xvcwD6FNpjmnWalMU/MJWQgayMt97dSQ1MS3BTBMr/mnx4U7ompfYFI8G8IhE44x4E P7Qsr2Q8LRmpRNknhydqOx6vkvvP4+6ZcyG2VChhGnudPvBKxXYqVylemjAj1tvKkrZ6 GPOaCX8hyN6KWjFgGfzHRipfBf6iBn3a5+A4nKCSwF4V5r0Cgcd1ai9e8t/iYp/BhM7X 4AtjqLldVhP9MgkO2Ng8uqJYA4Z2gI0KluR3Oaenh1aehi7dQ0/jh9wyq3liHMuDpMBb j3FQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.72.79 with SMTP id b15mr5091270vdv.13.1339939504484; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 06:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.182.168 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 06:25:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:25:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some restructuring of the download section From: Dave Page To: Magnus Hagander Cc: PostgreSQL WWW , Palle Girgensohn , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pierre=2DEmmanuel_Andr=E9?= , bjorn.munch@oracle.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmSL2Yz4Yw7rY3jlaHJ/ql/FOtPUNEsrxrRMYQNZrJmsN0tnAAW76hEpF+t0dn37AeuGTfc X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Archive-Number: 201206/27 X-Sequence-Number: 20721 On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> The large bold warnings about the installers were added because they >> used to be listed at the top of the page, above the platform-specific >> packaging options (because they tended to confuse people less). It's >> yet to be seen if users will become confused again - we have the info >> they should need now, but I suspect that doesn't necessarily mean >> they'll read it before emailing us. In any case, I think those >> warnings should either be removed or made non-bold now. > > I wouldn't want to remove them at all, since they're clearly still correct. > > In fact, given the number of people I've run into who've had problems > because of that, I'd rather leave them as bold as well. Citations please? I don't recall ever hearing of people running into such problems. I still maintain that it should be pretty blindingly obvious that a graphical installer isn't an RPM or DEB - and that being the case it seems like clutter on the page that is distracting from the more important text that's there and will achieve little except cause fewer people to actually read everything else. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company